Quantcast
Channel: Newsletters
Viewing all 408 articles
Browse latest View live

The Robins Kaplan Justice Report - Vol. 10, No. 3

$
0
0

This issue of The Robins Kaplan Justice Report includes the following:

  • The Fallacy of Tort “Reform,” by Elizabeth Fors
  • Selected Case Results
  • Antitrust Violations and your Clients: Three Things to Know, by Hollis Salzman and Kellie Lerner
  • Introducing Elizabeth Fors
  • Paralegal Spotlight: Lisa Birchen
  • Up & Coming Attorneys and Unsung Legal Heroes

© 2016 Robins Kaplan LLP


The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight - Vol. 2, No. 3

$
0
0

In this edition of The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight, we address “hot topics” involving fire and its insurance implications, including ingress/egress claims when wildfires cut off access to businesses, the fire damage legal liability limit in CGL policies, and claims arising from the Columbia gas explosions in Massachusetts. In addition, we discuss the heated conflict between artificial intelligence technology and tightening privacy regulations in the EU, as well as standards of review in insurance litigation appeals. 

We hope you enjoy this edition’s offerings and we welcome your feedback on topics and areas of interest for upcoming issues.

In This Issue

GENERICally Speaking - Vol. 9, No. 1

$
0
0

The Hatch-Waxman Litigation practice group at Robins Kaplan LLP is pleased to offer the latest edition of their quarterly publication regarding ANDA patent litigation issues and the generics business, GENERICally Speaking: A Hatch-Waxman Litigation Bulletin.

Taking on an ANDA patent litigation requires significant corporate resources, time, and money. Staying on top of industry news and outcomes, following trends in the judiciary and the steps others are taking, and keeping informed of recently enacted rules and legislation are critical.

This bulletin provides you and your company with some of the knowledge beneficial to remaining attentive to the complexity of ANDA patent litigation. We hope you find it helpful.

Relevant Court Decisions

  • Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.
    A commercial sale to a third party who is required to keep the invention confidential may place the invention “on sale” under § 102(a).
  • Endo Pharms. Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.
    The Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s holding that the claims of the ’737 patent were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
  • Grünenthal GmbH v. Alkem Labs. Ltd.
    Finding no clear error on the part of the district court concerning the issues of non-obviousness and non-infringement resulting from a “section viii” carve-out, the Federal Circuit affirmed.
  • Forest Labs., LLC v. Sigmapharm Labs., LLC
    Judgment of non-infringement vacated as a result of improper claim construction and judgment of non-obviousness remanded to make an express finding on motivation to combine references.
  • Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.
    JMOL of non-infringement was affirmed when the data relied on for proving infringement were speculative and not within the parameters of the district court’s claim construction.
  • Salix Pharms., Inc. v. Mylan Pharms Inc.
    Disqualification was permitted when law firm’s representation of defendant gave rise to a concurrent conflict of interest under Model Rule 1.7.
  • Belcher Pharms., LLC v. Int’l Medication Systems
    A Hatch-Waxman Act complaint complies with the requirements of Iqbal and Twombly when it alleges plaintiff’s: (i) interest in the patent, (ii) receipt of the paragraph IV certification, (iii) knowledge of the filing of the ANDA or NDA, and (iv) contention that the defendant’s proposed product will infringe.
  • Teva Pharms. U.S.A., Inc. v. Azar
    Because plaintiff did not have standing, its motion for a preliminary injunction to bar the FDA from depriving it of its 180-day marketing exclusivity was denied and defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted.
  • Adverio Pharma Gmbh v. Alembic Pharms. Ltd.
    Dismissal granted when plaintiff made no allegation (or reasonable basis to infer) that defendant would be involved in the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of ANDA applicant’s product after FDA approval.

GENERICally Speaking - Vol. 5, No. 3

$
0
0

The Hatch-Waxman Litigation practice group at Robins Kaplan LLP is pleased to offer the latest edition of their quarterly publication regarding ANDA patent litigation issues and the generics business, GENERICally Speaking: A Hatch-Waxman Litigation Bulletin.

Taking on an ANDA patent litigation requires significant corporate resources, time, and money. Staying on top of industry news and outcomes, following trends in the judiciary and the steps others are taking, and keeping informed of recently-enacted rules and legislation are critical.

This bulletin provides you and your company with some of the knowledge beneficial to remaining attentive to the complexity of ANDA patent litigation. We hope you find it helpful.

Relevant Court Decisions


The Robins Kaplan Justice Report - Vol. 13, No. 2

$
0
0

This issue of The Robins Kaplan Justice Report includes the following:

  • When Friendship Goes Wrong: Using Civil Litigation to Hold Fraternities and Sororities Accountable for Hazing
  • Selected Case Results
  • Antitrust Investigation: Interior Molded Doors
  • Mass Tort Investigations
  • The Importance of Mass Tort State Court Litigations
  • Recognition and Awards

© 2019 Robins Kaplan LLP

REAL TALK: The Robins Kaplan Business Law Update by the Women of Business Litigation

$
0
0

Welcome to the spring installment of Real Talk: The Robins Kaplan Business Law Update, a newsletter created by professional women for professional women. 

In this issue, we continue our interview series spotlighting the work, lives, career paths, and challenges facing professional women today. First, we hear from Kate K. Bruce, Associate General Counsel at Optum (a UnitedHealth Group company) about her perspectives on the legal field, the gender-related roadblocks in the profession, and the ways outside counsel can better serve in-house attorneys. We next examine a series of new and emerging issues in the law: the legal ramifications for the recent proliferation of sponsored Instagram posts and influencer marketing; the potential counterfeiting protections blockchains may confer in the fashion industry; and, finally, a recent United States Supreme Court ruling and its potential expansion of liability for misstatements under the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5.

Happy reading from the Robins Kaplan Women of Business Litigation!

In This Issue

  • Quarterly Leadership Spotlight: Interview Series Interview with Kate K. Bruce, Optum
    Chelsea Walcker
    Chelsea Walcker speaks with Kate Bruce, associate general counsel at Optum. Kate is responsible for providing enterprise-wide litigation support across many areas of the health care industry.

  • #Sponsored: Fyre, Floyd, Flat Tummy Tea, and Fraud
    Reena Jain
    As influencer marketing has taken over social media and become a permanent part of corporate marketing campaigns, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has provided guidelines for how influencers and brands should disclose their partnerships to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. § 45).

  • Can Blockchain Save the Fashion Industry?
    Carly Kessler
    Counterfeiting is one of the biggest threats to the fashion industry, deceiving unwary consumers and diluting brands’ values and hard-earned reputations. As a result, more and more brands are looking to technology as a way to gain back control of their products. Enter: blockchain.

  • SCOTUS Opens Door to Potential Expansion of Rule 10b-5 Liability for Misstatements
    Lisa Coyle
    The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lorenzo v. SEC potentially expands primary liability for misstatements under Rule 10b-5 by allowing private causes of action for such misstatements to be brought under Rule 10b-5(a) and (c), even where they could not otherwise be brought under Rule 10b-5(b) because the defendant was not the “maker” of the statement under Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders.

The Robins Kaplan Spotlight - Vol. 4, No. 2

$
0
0

The Robins Kaplan Spotlight is a newsletter of the firm’s Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes Group, created to provide a forum to discuss the latest news and other issues impacting the trusts and estates community.

This Summer 2019 issue focuses on “The Family Business and Succession Planning”:


© 2019 Robins Kaplan LLP

The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight - Vol. 1, No. 1

$
0
0

Welcome to our newest publication, The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight. Our goal is to deliver practical content to help you navigate the current challenges and latest developments in the insurance industry. This newsletter is curated by the women of Robins Kaplan with the goal of celebrating women in the profession and exploring topics of general interest in the insurance field. Whether you are in-house counsel, a broker, a claims adjuster, or anyone else in the industry, we hope that you find our newsletter interesting and informative. Thank you and enjoy!

In This Issue


The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight - Vol. 1, No. 4

$
0
0

In our winter edition of The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight, we bring you articles on all things tech: from liability exposure in the age of driverless cars and home sharing arrangements, to managing privacy concerns posed by drones and potential coverage for computer hacking. We also discuss the latest initiatives designed to promote gender diversity in the workplace as well as welcome two new women to our team. Finally, we share information on upcoming events for women in the insurance industry.

Happy holidays from the Robins Kaplan Women of Insurance!

In This Issue

GENERICally Speaking - Vol. 6, No. 3

$
0
0

The Hatch-Waxman Litigation practice group at Robins Kaplan LLP is pleased to offer the latest edition of their quarterly publication regarding ANDA patent litigation issues and the generics business, GENERICally Speaking: A Hatch-Waxman Litigation Bulletin.

Taking on an ANDA patent litigation requires significant corporate resources, time, and money. Staying on top of industry news and outcomes, following trends in the judiciary and the steps others are taking, and keeping informed of recently-enacted rules and legislation are critical.

This bulletin provides you and your company with some of the knowledge beneficial to remaining attentive to the complexity of ANDA patent litigation. We hope you find it helpful.

Relevant Court Decisions

  • The Medicines Co. v. Hospira, Inc.
    On-sale bar is not triggered by production of drug by third party, even if that drug is stockpiled and later sold.
  • Allergan Sales, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc.
    Issue and claim preclusion do not apply when (i) the court issues a new claim construction; and (ii) the defendant has engaged in a section viii carve out in its proposed ANDA label.
  • Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Elan Pharms., Inc.
    Reanalyzing clinical data to identify patentable information and filing patent applications as well as making and selling a drug with a revised label reflecting the information derived from that clinical study falls into the § 271(e)(1) safe harbor provision and does not infringe as a matter of law.
  • Novartis AG v. Ezra Ventures, LLC
    A patent-term extension of a continuation does not violate 35 U.S.C. § 156 because a patentee can extend the term for one chosen patent.
  • Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC v. Fera Pharms., LLC
    Relying on the Federal Circuit’s likelihood-of-success standard for awarding preliminary injunctions, the district court preliminary enjoined defendants from infringing the patent-in-suit.
  • Ferring Pharms., Inc. v. Burwell
    FDA’s prior practice of refusing to grant five-year exclusivity to fixed-combination drug products containing a novel active drug substance was arbitrary and capricious.
  • Sanofi v. Glenmark Pharms. Inc.
    Based on Defendants’ proposed ANDA labels, the court found Defendants liable for induced infringement; the claims were not invalid as obvious.
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Warner Chilcott Co., LLC
    A patent is obvious in view of the knowledge of one of skill in the art to disclose the gaps not inherently disclosed in the primary reference.
  • Vanda Pharm. Inc. v. Roxane Labs., Inc.
    The court rejected defendant’s obviousness defense, finding fault with its lead-compound analysis and probative evidence of secondary considerations of non-obviousness; the court also found the asserted claims infringed directly and by inducement, but found no contributory infringement.
  • Eli Lilly & Co. v. Perrigo Co.
    Two of plaintiff’s patents relating to the formulation and application of axillary transdermal testosterone were invalid while a third patent was valid and infringed by one of the joint defendants.
  • Horizon Pharma Ireland Ltd. v. Actavis Labs., UT, Inc.
    All of the proposed terms for construction are indefinite.
  • UCB, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
    After stipulating to infringement, the court addressed and rejected various arguments that the asserted claims were invalid.
  • Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al v. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., et al
    Given the recent Supreme Court decisions concerning jurisdiction, general jurisdiction over branded drug company does not exist because branded company defends itself in prior litigation, and specific jurisdiction is not present when the branded drug company has limited contacts with the forum.
  • Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharm. Co., Inc.
    An exceptional case finding is not supported when there was a genuine issue regarding how to test to determine if a claim element is present.
  • GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.
    GSK adequately pled a claim of induced infringement alleging facts concerning ways in which Teva actively promoted its generic product and the content of Teva’s skinny label.
  • Bayer Pharma AG v. Watson Labs., Inc.
    Subsequent patent teaching a formulation of specific dosage amounts was not invalid for general or double-patenting obviousness when the specific dosages produced unexpected results contrary to the knowledge of one of ordinary skill at the time of patenting.
  • Forest Labs. Holdings Ltd. v. Mylan Inc.
    A label that states that patients may use a dosing schedule that differs from the label’s proposed schedule does not create a defense to induced infringement.
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG v. FDA
    The FDA’s interpretation of the statutory language determining when an NDA is “initially submitted” is due deference, is reasonable, is consistent, and is not arbitrary or capricious.

GENERICally Speaking - Vol. 9, No. 2

The Robins Kaplan Justice Report - Vol. 13, No. 3

$
0
0

This issue of The Robins Kaplan Justice Report includes the following:

  • Empowering Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse
  • Court of Appeals Affirms $3.17M Verdict in Post-Op Surgical Infection Case
  • Mass Tort Investigations
  • Recognition and Awards
  • Save the Date

© 2019 Robins Kaplan LLP

Diversity and Inclusion Update Summer 2019

$
0
0

The Robins Kaplan Diversity and Inclusion Update is circulated on a quarterly basis to share upcoming events, provide updates on key initiatives, and showcase the diversity of our firm members in the Diversity Spotlight. We hope this newsletter continues to serve as a way to highlight our firm’s persistent work to foster an inclusive environment, as well as recognize partnerships that ensure our efforts benefit more than just those within our firm. 


© 2019 Robins Kaplan LLP

The Robins Kaplan Spotlight - Vol. 4, No. 3

$
0
0

The Robins Kaplan Spotlight is a newsletter of the firm’s Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes Group, created to provide a forum to discuss the latest news and other issues impacting the trusts and estates community.

This Fall 2019 issue focuses on “Global Considerations for Estate Planning”:

  • International Privacy Protections: Closer to Home Than You Might Think, by Michael Reif and Tim Billion
  • International Estate Planning: Using a Qualified Domestic Trust (QDOT) for Non-U.S. Citizen Spouses, by Matthew Frerichs
  • The Day “La Musique” Died. Let the Litigation Roll. by Shira Shapiro

© 2019 Robins Kaplan LLP

The Robins Kaplan Justice Report - Vol. 13, No. 4

$
0
0

This issue of The Robins Kaplan Justice Report includes the following:

  • JUUL and the Youth Vaping Epidemic
  • Doctors Owe A Duty of Care Whenever There is a Foreseeable Risk of Harm to a Patient
  • Mass Tort Investigations
  • Child Se Abuse Litigation Update
  • Results and Recognition & Awards
  • Firm Events

© 2019 Robins Kaplan LLP


Endo Pharm., Inc. v. Actavis LLC

$
0
0

Case Name: Endo Pharm., Inc. v. Actavis LLC, No. 2018-1054, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 13348 (Fed. Cir. May 3, 2019) (Circuit Judges Wallach, Clevenger, and Stoll presiding; Opinion by Wallach; Dissent by Stoll) (Appeal from D. Del., Andrews, J.) 

Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Opana® ER; U.S. Patent No. 8,871,779 (“the ’779 patent)

Nature of Case and Issue(s) Presented: Plaintiffs Endo and Mallinckrodt sued Actavis alleging infringement of the ’779 patent, which Endo licenses from Mallinckrodt. The district court held that Actavis failed to prove that any claims were invalid as obvious or anticipated and entered final judgment of infringement based on a stipulation by the parties. Actavis appealed, contending that the district court erred by misconstruing a claim term and finding claims 1-6 were not obvious in light of prior art. The Federal Circuit, in a majority opinion, affirmed the district court.

The ‘779 patent relates to morphinan alkaloid compounds, such as oxymorphone, which have “great medical importance” and “are used extensively for pain relief.” Id. at *2. Pharmaceutically desirable morphinan compounds often have a ketone group and a single (saturated) bond between two carbon atoms positioned α and β to the ketone group (“morphinan-6-one compounds”). Morphinan-6-one compounds are produced using various processes, many of which involve some form of catalytic hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated ketone intermediate compounds (“ABUKs”). The relevant ABUKs in this case were 14-hydroxymorphinones, or oxymorphone ABUKs, which are ABUK impurities in oxymorphone that are also considered a precursor to oxymorphone because they can be converted into oxymorphone. Catalytic hydrogenation of oxymorphone ABUKs converts the double (unsaturated) bond to a single (saturated) bond by adding a hydrogen atom. However, this process can result in ABUKs persisting as impurities in the final product and can undesirably reduce ketone, which is a key functional part of oxymorphone.

The ‘779 patent discloses processes for producing oxymorphone that has relatively low concentrations of ABUK impurities. These processes reduce ABUK impurities by treating a reaction mixture including oxymorphone and an ABUK with a sulfur–containing compound. This treatment can reduce ABUK concentrations to levels less than 0.001% by weight or 10 parts per million (“ppm”) with minimal side reactions, ketone reduction, or other undesirable effects.

The 0.001% oxymorphone ABUK concentration level stemmed from FDA communications with Mallinckrodt that outlined the FDA’s processes for addressing the problem of mutagenic oxymorphone impurities. Specifically, the communications disclosed that an ABUK concentration of 0.001% in oxymorphone was required to satisfy FDA approval guidelines.

Why Endo Prevailed: The Federal Circuit first addressed the issue of claim construction. The district court found that a POSA would understand the 14‑hydroxymorphinone, an α, β unsaturated ketone, or “ABUK,” limitations stated in claims 1, 2, and 5 to mean “14-hydroxymorphinone hydrochloride.” Actavis argued that the term did not need to be construed because of its plain meaning and the undisputed chemical difference between 14‑hydroxymorphinone and its hydrochloride salt. The Federal Circuit disagreed. The asserted claims only claimed 14-hydroxymorphinone as part of the salt or hydrochloride form of the claimed compounds, not as a separate non-salt or hydrochloride component, which indicated that 14-hydroxymorphinone as used in the claims meant 14‑hydroxymorphinone hydrochloride. This was confirmed by both parties’ experts.

Next, the Federal Circuit addressed the obviousness issue. Three references constituted prior art. “Weiss” disclosed the use of catalytic hydrogenation to convert oxymorphone ABUK to oxymorphone, specifically, employing palladium charcoal as a catalyst to obtain oxymorphone. “Chapman” disclosed processes that employ catalytic hydrogenation to purify oxycodone ABUK into the salt form of oxycodone. Chapman recites processes that convert oxycodone ABUK to oxycodone diol, a precursor to oxycodone ABUK, which can frustrate purification by reverting to oxycodone ABUK through the compound’s conversion to salt form. Chapman provides a reaction that can remove oxycodone diol from a sample before purification is complete to prevent its reversion to oxycodone ABUK. Finally, “Rapoport” discloses a process to convert oxycodone ABUK to oxycodone by adding bisulfite to separate oxycodone from oxycodone ABUK.

The Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that a POSA would not have a reasonable expectation of success in combining the prior art references. First, a POSA would not have a reasonable expectation of success employing Weiss’s catalytic hydrogenation process for oxymorphone with Chapman’s process for removing diol hydrogenation. While Weiss disclosed a method of purifying oxymorphone ABUK through catalytic hydrogenation, it was missing the following: (i) key reaction conditions, such as the time the reaction is run, the amount and composition of the catalyst, and the pressure of hydrogen gas; (ii) any level of achieved purification of oxymorphone let alone purification to the degree claimed by the ‘779 patent; and (iii) a disclosure that catalytic hydrogenation of oxymorphone ABUK produces oxymorphone diol much more readily than oxycodone ABUK and is thus much less effective on oxymorphone ABUK because oxymorphone diol hinders purification by reverting to oxymorphone ABUK. Similarly, Chapman disclosed a process to hydrogenate oxycodone ABUK that creates oxycodone diol, which can hinder purification by reverting to ABUK after an attempted purification. The Chapman process also likely does not achieve the same purity as the process claimed by the ‘779 patent. The only example provided in Chapman reduced the oxycodone diol content of an oxycodone sample to 400 ppm, well above the 10 ppm limit claimed by the ‘779 patent. The example also had a long reaction time of approximately 20 hours, which is undesirable because the longer a hydrogenation reactions runs, the less diol is removed and the more side reactions that introduce other materials occur. More side reactions result in less of the desired product, ketone, in the final product.

Second, Rapoport’s sulfur addition and separation process did not confer a reasonable expectation of success to remove oxymorphone impurities because: (i) Rapoport does not state that any of its disclosed compounds have the purity levels claimed by the ‘779 patent; and (ii) the processes also resulted in a large loss of the desired compound, ketone.

Third, the teaching of Weiss, Chapman, and Rapoport in view of the FDA communications would not provide a POSA with a reasonable expectation of successfully achieving the oxymorphone purity levels claimed by the ‘779 patent. The FDA mandated a 0.001% or 10 ppm ABUK content in oxymorphone, which incentivized purifying oxymorphone to the level claimed by the ‘779 patent, but did not teach how the mandate could be attained. Accordingly, the FDA communications conveyed nothing that would have led a POSA to believe that the sulfur process described in Rapoport might be more effective on oxymorphone ABUK. Therefore, the FDA communications would not have been enough to overcome the disclosures of Weiss, Chapman, and Rapoport, which indicated that a POSA would not reasonably believe their disclosed methods were fruitful avenues to achieve the FDA-mandated oxymorphone purity level.

Finally, the Federal Circuit held that the district court did not err as a matter of law by imposing a heightened standard for the reasonable expectation test. Actavis argued that the district court’s statement that a POSA would not find a “definitive solution” to the diol problem in Chapman improperly heightened the standard for the reasonable expectation test. However, this was not sufficient to find legal error because the statement was “isolated” and “stripped from its context.”

Judge Stoll’s Dissent: Judge Stoll’s dissent finds three errors in the district court’s opinion. First, the district court erred by not equating the FDA’s mandate to achieve 10 ppm purity with a motivation to combine. According to Judge Stoll, the FDA’s mandate discloses “every limitation of claim 1 and is the only references that expressly disclose the limitation of oxymorphone ABUK content less than 0.001%.” Second, the district court erred by elevating the reasonable expectation of success standard to require “that the prior art provide a definitive solution to the problem and proof of actual success.” This standard is greater than the “reasonable expectation of success” standard. Third, the district court erred by conflating the requirements of reasonable expectation of success and motivation to combine. According to the dissent, the district court conflated those requirements by holding that the FDA communications must teach how to achieve the claimed invention in order to provide a motivation to combine. This was because whether a reference teaches how to achieve the claimed invention “speaks to enablement or reasonable expectation of success,” which are “entirely separate inquiries from motivation to combine.” In light of these errors, the district court’s decision should have been vacated and remanded to allow it to apply the correct test for obviousness and “properly consider the role of the FDA mandate—the sole reasons for the ‘779 patent’s existence—in the obviousness analysis.”



New ANDA Cases

$
0
0
Case NameDate FiledJudgeDrugPatent No(s).
Pharmacyclics LLC v. Hetero USA Inc., 19-0014 (D. Del.)Jan. 4, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollyImbruvica® (ibrutinib capsules)10,106,548
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Strides Pharma Inc., 19-0133 (D.N.J.)Jan. 4, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Celgene Corp. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 19-0143 (D.N.J.)Jan. 4, 2019Hon. Esther SalasPomalyst® (pomalidomide capsules)9,993,467
Arbor Pharms., LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 19-0053 (D. Del.)Jan. 9, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollySklice® (ivermectin lotion)8,791,153
8,927,595
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Unichem Labs., Ltd., 19-0055 (D. Del.)Jan. 9, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkEliquis® (apixaban tablets)6,967,208
Sun Pharm. Indus. Ltd. v. Novartis Pharms. Corp., 19-0276 (D.N.J.)Jan. 9, 2019Hon. Susan D. WigentonJadenu® (deferasirox tablets)9,283,209
Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corp., IPR2019-00554 (PTAB)Jan. 9, 2019N/AOnpattro® (patisiran sodium for injection)8,058,069
Onyx Therapeutics, Inc. v. Breckenridge Pharm., Inc., 19-0071 (D. Del.)Jan. 11, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkKyprolis® (carfilzomib for injection)7,417,042
7,737,112
8,207,125
Genentech, Inc. v. Laurus Labs Ltd., 19-0078 (D. Del.)Jan. 14, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
7,696,236
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Zydus Pharms. (USA) Inc., 19-0529 (D.N.J.)Jan. 15, 2019Hon. Brian R. MartinottiTruvada® (emtricitabine / tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets)6,642,245
6,703,396
8,592,397
8,716,264
9,457,036
9,744,181
Genentech, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 19-0103 (D. Del.)Jan. 17, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
7,696,236
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Genentech, Inc. v. Laurus Labs Ltd., 19-0104 (D. Del.)Jan. 17, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Genentech, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 19-0105 (D. Del.)Jan. 17, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
9,561,217
Beloteca, Inc. v. Apicore US LLC, 19-0360 (N.D. Ill.)Jan. 17, 2019Hon. John J. Tharp, Jr.Lymphazurin® (isosulfan blue for injection)7,662,992
8,969,616
9,353,050
Genentech, Inc. v. Lupin Ltd., 19-0109 (D. Del.)Jan. 18, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
7,696,236
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Genentech, Inc. v. Lupin Ltd., 19-0110 (D. Del.)Jan. 18, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Genentech, Inc. v. Micro Labs Ltd., 19-0111 (D. Del.)Jan. 18, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Genentech, Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 19-0120 (D. Del.)Jan. 22, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
7,696,236
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Genentech, Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 19-0123 (D. Del.)Jan. 22, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
9,561,217
Par Pharm., Inc. v. Pfizer Inc., 19-0615 (S.D.N.Y.)Jan. 22, 2019Hon. William H. Pauley, IIIChantix® (varenicline tartrate tablets)6,890,927
7,265,119
Genentech, Inc. v. Shilpa Medicare Ltd., 19-0130 (D. Del.)Jan. 23, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)8,383,150
8,778,947
Genentech, Inc. v. SciGen Pharms. Inc., 19-0131 (D. Del.)Jan. 23, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)8,383,150
9,561,217
Genentech, Inc. v. SciGen Pharms. Inc., 19-0132 (D. Del.)Jan. 23, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules)8,383,150
8,420,674
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Cipla Ltd., 19-0988 (D.N.J.)Jan. 23, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 19-0990 (D.N.J.)Jan. 23, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Genentech, Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 19-0136 (D. Del.)Jan. 24, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Taro Pharm. Indus. Ltd. v. Novitium Pharma, LLC, 19-1028 (D.N.J.)Jan. 24, 2019Hon. Freda L. WolfsonOvide® (malathion lotion)7,560,445
7,977,324
Japan Tobacco Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 19-0012 (N.D.W.V.)Jan. 24, 2019Hon. Irene M. KeeleyStribild® (elvitegravir / cobicistat / emtricitabine / tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets)8,633,219
Genentech, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc., 19-0141 (D. Del.)Jan. 25, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
7,696,236
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Genentech, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc., 19-0142 (D. Del.)Jan. 25, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Pharmacyclics LLC v. Zydus Worldwide DMCC, 19-0143 (D. Del.)Jan. 25, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollyImbruvica® (ibrutinib capsules)7,514,444
8,008,309
8,697,711
8,735,403
8,957,079
9,181,257
8,754,091
8,497,277
8,952,015
8,476,284
8,754,090
9,296,753
9,725,455
10,125,140
10,106,548
Genentech, Inc. v. Macleods Pharms. Ltd., 19-0154 (D. Del.)Jan. 28, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules) 7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
7,696,236
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Genentech, Inc. v. Granules Pharms., Inc., 19-0164 (D. Del.)Jan. 28, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)8,383,150
8,420,674
8,778,947
Genentech, Inc. v. Alembic Pharms., Ltd., 19-0177 (D. Del.)Jan. 29, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Genentech, Inc. v. Hetero Labs Ltd., 19-0178 (D. Del.)Jan. 29, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Genentech, Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 19-0190 (D. Del.)Jan. 30, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Genentech, Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 19-0195 (D. Del.)Jan. 30, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
7,696,236
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Galephar Pharm. Research, Inc. v. Upsher-Smith Labs., LLC, 19-2546 (D.N.J.)Jan. 30, 2019Hon. Madeline Cox ArleoAbsorica® (isotretinoin capsules)7,435,427
8,367,102
8,952,064
9,078,925
9,089,534
Genentech, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 19-0202 (D. Del.)Jan. 31, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
9,561,217
Genentech, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 19-0203 (D. Del.)Jan. 31, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone capsules)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
7,696,236
7,767,225
7,988,994
8,753,679
Genentech, Inc. v. MSN Labs. Private Ltd., 19-0205 (D. Del.)Jan. 31, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)8,383,150
8,778,947
Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Hetero USA Inc., 19-0211 (D. Del.)Jan. 31, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkTecfidera® (dimethyl fumarate delayed-release capsules)7,619,001
Genentech, Inc. v. Cipla Ltd., 19-0219 (D. Del.)Feb. 1, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Chemo Research S.L., 19-0220 (D. Del.)Feb. 1, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkAuryxia® (ferric citrate tablets)5,753,706
7,767,851
8,093,423
8,299,298
8,338,642
8,609,896
8,754,257
8,754,258
8,846,976
8,901,349
9,050,316
9,328,133
9,387,191
9,757,416
Leo Pharma A/S v. Taro Pharms. U.S.A., 19-0221 (D. Del.)Feb. 1, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollyFinacea® (azelaic acid foam)7,700,076
8,435,498
8,722,021
8,900,554
9,211,259
9,265,725
10,117,812
Genentech, Inc. v. Aizant Drug Research Solutions Pvt. Ltd., 19-0223 (D. Del.)Feb. 1, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)7,566,729
7,635,707
7,767,700
7,816,383
7,910,610
8,013,002
8,084,475
8,318,780
8,383,150
8,420,674
8,592,462
8,609,701
8,648,098
8,754,109
8,778,947
Par Pharm., Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 19-4432 (D.N.J.)Feb. 1, 2019Hon. Madeline Cox ArleoJanumet® XR (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)7,326,708
Leo Pharma A/S v. Taro Pharms. U.S.A., 19-1051 (S.D.N.Y.)Feb. 4, 2019Hon. Colleen McMahonFinacea® (azelaic acid foam)7,700,076
8,435,498
8,722,021
8,900,554
9,211,259
9,265,725
10,117,812
Genzyme Corp. v. Zenara Pharma Private Ltd., 19-0264 (D. Del.)Feb. 7, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollyCerdelga® (eliglustat capsules)6,916,802
7,196,205
7,253,185
7,615,573
Corcept Therapeutics Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 19-5066 (D.N.J.)Feb. 8, 2019Hon. Susan D. WigentonKorlym® (mifepristone tablets)10,166,242
10,166,243
10,195,214
Genzyme Corp. v. Zenara Pharma Private Ltd., 19-5160 (D.N.J.)Feb. 8, 2019Hon. Brian R. MartinottiCerdelga® (eliglustat capsules)6,916,802
7,196,205
7,253,185
7,615,573
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Zydus Pharms. (USA) Inc., 19-5162 (D.N.J.)Feb. 8, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Accord Healthcare Inc., 19-0303 (D. Del.)Feb. 12, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkTecfidera® (dimethyl fumarate delayed-release capsules)7,619,001
Meda Pharms. Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 19-5501 (D.N.J.)Feb. 12, 2019Hon. Brian R. MartinottiAstepro® (azelastine HCl nasal spray)8,071,073
8,518,919
9,919,050
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Alvogen Pine Brook LLC, 19-0310 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanumet® XR (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)7,326,708
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Anchen Pharms., Inc., 19-0311 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanumet® XR (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)7,326,708
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Sandoz Inc., 19-0312 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanumet® XR (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)

Januvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)

7,326,708
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Apotex Inc., 19-0313 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanumet® XR (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)

Januvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)

Janumet® (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl)
7,326,708
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Zydus Pharms. (USA) Inc., 19-0314 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanumet® XR (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)

Januvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)

Janumet® (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl)
7,326,708
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 19-0315 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanuvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)7,326,708
8,414,921
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Macleods Pharms. Ltd., 19-0316 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanuvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)

Janumet® (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl)
7,326,708
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Watson Labs., Inc., 19-0317 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanuvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)7,326,708
8,414,921
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 19-0318 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanumet® XR (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)

Januvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)

Janumet® (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl)

Juvisync® (simvastatin/ sitagliptin phosphate)
7,326,708
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Sun Pharma Global FZE, 19-0319 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanumet® XR (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)

Januvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)

Janumet® (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl)
7,326,708
8,414,921
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Torrent Pharms. Ltd., 19-0320 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanuvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)7,326,708
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Wockhardt Bio AG, 19-0321 (D. Del.)Feb. 13, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanuvia® (sitagliptin phosphate)

Janumet® (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl)
7,326,708
Genentech, Inc. v. Torrent Pharms. Ltd., 19-0324 (D. Del.)Feb. 14, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsEsbriet® (pirfenidone tablets)8,383,150
8,778,947
Celgene Corp. v. Hetero Labs Ltd., 19-5797 (D.N.J.)Feb. 14, 2019Hon. Esther SalasPomalyst® (pomalidomide capsules)10,093,647
10,093,648
10,093,649
Celgene Corp. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 19-5799 (D.N.J.)Feb. 14, 2019Hon. Esther SalasPomalyst® (pomalidomide capsules)10,093,647
10,093,648
10,093,649
Celgene Corp. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 19-5802 (D.N.J.)Feb. 14, 2019Hon. Esther SalasPomalyst® (pomalidomide capsules)10,093,647
10,093,648
10,093,649
Celgene Corp. v. Breckenridge Pharm., Inc., 19-5804 (D.N.J.)Feb. 14, 2019Hon. Esther SalasPomalyst® (pomalidomide capsules)10,093,647
10,093,648
10,093,649
Celgene Corp. v. Apotex Inc., 19-5806 (D.N.J.)Feb. 14, 2019Hon. Esther SalasPomalyst® (pomalidomide capsules)10,093,647
10,093,648
10,093,649
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Apotex Inc., 19-5939 (D.N.J.)Feb. 15, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Zydus Pharms. (USA) Inc., 19-5987 (D.N.J.)Feb. 15, 2019Hon. Brian R. MartinottiTecfidera® (dimethyl fumarate delayed-release capsules)7,619,001
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Lupin Ltd., 19-0347 (D. Del.)Feb. 19, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsJanumet® (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin HCl)7,326,708
Galderma Labs. L.P. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 19-0351 (D. Del.)Feb. 19, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsSoolantra® (ivermectin cream)10,206,939
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000685 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,211,253
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000686 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,211,253
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000687 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,211,253
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000688 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,468,747
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000689 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,468,747
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000690 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,468,747
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000691 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,561,177
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000692 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,561,177
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000693 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,561,177
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000694 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,629,965
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000695 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,629,965
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000696 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,629,965
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000697 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,775,838
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000698 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,775,838
Nalox-1 Pharms., LLC v. Opiant Pharms., Inc., IPR2019-000699 (PTAB)Feb. 19, 2019N/ANarcan® (naloxone HCl nasal spray)9,775,838
Celgene Corp. v. Apotex Inc., 19-6999 (D.N.J.)Feb. 26, 2019Hon. Susan D. WigentonRevlimid® (lenalidomide capsules)7,189,740
8,404,717
9,056,120
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. v. Lupin Ltd., 19-7165 (D.N.J.)Feb. 27, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanInvokamet XR® (canagliflozin / metformin HCl extended-release tablets)7,943,582
8,513,202
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Macleods Pharms. Ltd., 19-7296 (D.N.J.)Feb. 28, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Pharmacyclics LLC v. Alvogen Pine Brook LLC, 19-0434 (D. Del.)Mar. 1, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollyImbruvica® (ibrutinib capsules)7,514,444
8,008,309
8,476,284
8,497,277
8,697,711
8,735,403
8,754,090
8,754,091
8,952,015
8,957,079
9,181,257
9,296,753
9,655,857
9,725,455
10,010,507
10,106,548
10,125,140
Endo Pharms. Inc. v. Perrigo UK Finco Ltd., 19-0437 (D. Del.)Mar. 1, 2019Hon. Maryellen NoreikaNascobal® (cyanocobalamin nasal spray)7,229,636
7,404,489
7,879,349
8,003,353
8,940,714
9,415,007
Cipla Ltd. v. AstraZeneca AB, 19-0438 (D. Del.)Mar. 1, 2019Hon. Maryellen NoreikaNexium® (esomeprazole magnesium delayed-release oral suspension)6,428,810
Galderma Labs., L.P. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 19-0440 (D. Del.)Mar. 1, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkOracea® (doxycycline capsules)10,058,564
Biodelivery Sciences Int’l, Inc. v. Chemo Research, S.L., 19-0444 (D. Del.)Mar. 1, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollyBelbuca® (buprenorphine buccal film)8,147,866
9,655,843
9,901,539
Sun Pharm. Indus. Ltd. v. Vistapharm, Inc., 19-7536 (D.N.J.)Mar. 1, 2019Hon. Stanley R. CheslerRiomet® (metformin HCl oral solution)6,890,957
Apicore US LLC v. Beloteca, Inc., 19-0077 (E.D. Tex.)Mar. 4, 2019Hon. Rodney GilstrapIsosulfan blue for injection8,969,616
9,353,050
Sawai USA, Inc. v. Biogen MA, Inc., IPR2019-00789 (PTAB)Mar. 4, 2019N/ATecfidera® (dimethyl fumarate delayed-release capsules)8,399,514
Millennium Pharms., Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc., 19-0471 (D. Del.)Mar. 6, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollyVelcade® (bortezomib for injection)6,713,446
6,958,319
UCB, Inc. v. Actavis Labs. UT, Inc., 19-0474 (D. Del.)Mar. 6, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkNeupro® (rotigotine transdermal system)10,130,589
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Slayback Pharma, LLC, 19-8218 (D.N.J.)Mar. 8, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 19-8233 (D.N.J.)Mar. 8, 2019Hon. Peter G. SheridanJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 19-0037 (N.D.W.V.)Mar. 11, 2019Hon. Thomas S. KleehJublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444
Pfizer Inc. v. Ajanta Pharma Ltd., 19-0517 (D. Del.)Mar. 15, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkXeljanz® (tofacitinib tablets)6,965,027
RE41,783
Biodelivery Sciences Int’l, Inc. v. Chemo Research, S.L., 19-8660 (D.N.J.)Mar. 15, 2019Hon. Kevin McNultyBelbuca® (buprenorphine buccal film)8,147,866
9,655,843
9,901,539
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 19-0040 (N.D.W.V.)Mar. 15, 2019Hon. Thomas S. KleehAuryxia® (ferric citrate tablets)5,753,706
7,767,851
8,093,423
8,299,298
8,338,642
8,609,896
8,754,257
8,754,258
8,846,976
8,901,349
9,050,316
9,328,133
9,387,191
9,757,416
Celgene Corp. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 19-8758 (D.N.J.)Mar. 19, 2019Hon. Esther SalasPomalyst® (pomalidomide capsules)10,093,647
10,093,648
10,093,649
Mayne Pharma Int’l Pty Ltd. v. Prinston Pharm. Inc., 19-0549 (D. Del.)Mar. 21, 2019Hon. Richard G. AndrewsDoryx® MPC (doxycycline hyclate delayed-release tablets)9,295,652
9,446,057
9,511,031
Sandoz Inc. v. Pharmacyclics LLC, IPR2019-00865 (PTAB)Mar. 21, 2019N/AImbruvica® (ibrutinib tablets)

Imbruvica® (ibrutinib capsules)
9,795,604
Mallinckrodt Hospital Products IP Ltd. v. Altan Pharma Ltd., 19-0552 (D. Del.)Mar. 22, 2019Hon. Leonard P. StarkOfirmev® (acetaminophen for injection)9,399,012
9,610,265
9,987,238
6,992,218
Vanda Pharms. Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 19-0560 (D. Del.)Mar. 22, 2019Hon. Colm F. ConnollyHetlioz® (tasimelteon capsules)10,149,829
Indivior Inc. v. Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., 19-60757 (S.D. Fla.)Mar. 22, 2019Hon. Beth BloomSuboxone® (buprenorphine HCl / naloxone HCl sublingual film)8,017,150
8,603,514
9,687,454
9,931,305
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 19-8840 (D.N.J.)Mar. 22, 2019Hon. Brian R. MartinottiPradaxa® (dabigatran etexilate mesylate capsules)6,087,380
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs., Ltd., 19-1246 (S.D. Ind.)Mar. 27, 2019Hon. Jane Magnus-StinsonAlimta® (pemetrexed for injection)7,772,209
Eagle Pharms., Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc., 19-0344 (M.D.N.C.)Mar. 27, 2019Hon. William L. Osteen, Jr.Argatroban Injections7,589,106
7,687,516
Eagle Pharms., Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc., 19-9031 (D.N.J.)Mar. 27, 2019Hon. Claire C. CecchiArgatroban Injections7,589,106
7,687,516

Generic Launches

$
0
0
Reference Listed DrugNDA HolderGeneric Drug NameANDA
Applicant(s)
IndicationLaunch Date
Lidex OintmentCounty Line PharmaceuticalsFluocinonide OintmentLupinindicated for the relief of the inflammatory and pruritic manifestations of Corticosteroid-Responsive Dermatoses3/28/2019
RitalinNovartisMethylphenidate HCl ER TabletsANIindicated for the treatment of ADHD in children 6 years of age and older, adolescents, and adults up to the age of 653/27/2019
E.E.S.Abbott LabsErythromycin Ethylsuccinate for Oral SuspensionANIindicated in the treatment of infections caused by susceptible strains of selected diseases3/27/2019
CialisEli Lilly and CompanyTadalafil TabletsApotexused to treat Erectile Dysfunction (Impotence) and symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (Enlarged Prostate)3/27/2019
CialisEli Lilly and CompanyTadalafil TabletsDr. Reddy'sused to treat Erectile Dysfunction (Impotence) and symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (Enlarged Prostate)3/27/2019
ProzacEli Lilly and CompanyFluoxetine TabletsUpsher-Smithused to treat depression, panic attacks, obsessive compulsive disorder, a certain eating disorder (Bulimia), and a severe form of premenstrual syndrome (Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder)3/27/2019
CialisEli Lilly and CompanyTadalafil TabletsZydusused to treat Erectile Dysfunction (Impotence) and symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (Enlarged Prostate)3/27/2019
RemodulinUnited Therapeutics CorporationTreprostinil InjectionSandozindicated for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)3/25/2019
LevophedHospiraNorepinephrine Bitartrate InjectionHikmaindicated for blood pressure control in certain acute hypotensive states 3/22/2019
SynthroidAbbVieLevothyroxine Sodium Tablets Lupinindicated for Hypothyroidisn and Pituitary Thyrotropin (Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone, TSH)3/22/2019
ExjadeNovartisDeferasirox Tablets for Oral SuspensionTevaindicated for the treatment of chronic iron overload due to blood transfusions inpatients two years of age and older3/22/2019
Exelon PatchNovartisRivastigmine Transdermal SystemAmnealused to treat mild to moderate dementia caused by Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease3/12/2019
Rythmol SRGlaxoSmithKlinePropafenone HCl ER CapsulesVitruvias and Sinotherapeuticsis used to help prevent certain types of serious (possibly fatal) irregular heartbeat (such as Paroxysmal Supraventricular is indicated for the treatment of sustained Ventricular Tachycardia that is deemed to be life-threatening3/8/2019
AmrixTevaCyclobenzaprine HCl ER CapsulesTevafor use as an adjunct to rest and physical therapy for relief of muscle spasm associated with acute, painful masculoskeleal conditions3/6/2019
HumalogEli Lilly and CompanyInsulin Lispro InjectionEli Lilly and Company (ImClone)used to control high blood sugar in adults and children with diabetes mellitus3/4/2019
TekturnaNoden Pharma DACAliskiren Hemifumarate TabletsPrascoindicated for the treatment of Hypertension in adults and children 6 years of age and older3/4/2019
AmrixTevaCyclobenzaprine HCl ER CapsulesApotexis indicated as an adjunct to rest and physical therapy for relief of muscle spasm associated with acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions3/1/2019
LovazaGlaxoSmithKlineOmega-3 Acid Ethyl Esters CapsulesCamber Pharmaceuticalsused to lower levels of Triglycerides and may raise "good" Cholesterol3/1/2019
Flector PatchIBSA Institute Biochimique SADiclofenac Epolamine Topical PatchTevaused as a pain reliver indicated for the topical treatment of acute pain due to minor strains, sprains, and contusions3/1/2019
AmrixTevaCyclobenzaprine HCl ER CapsulesTwiindicated as an adjunct to rest and physical therapy for relief of muscle spasm associated with acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions3/1/2019
RocephinHoffmann La RocheCeftriaxone for InjectionApotexused to treat conditions such as lower respiratory tract infections, skin and skin structure infections, urinary tract infections, pelvic inflammatory disease, bacterial septicemia, bone and joint infections, and Meningitis2/28/2019
RanexaGilead SciencesRanolazine ER TabletsLupinindicated for the treatment of chronic angina2/28/2019
OcufloxAllerganOfloxacin Ophthalmic SolutionApotexused to treat bacterial infections of the eye, including Conjunctivitis (pink eye) and ulcers of the cornea2/27/2019
SolodynMedicis PharmaceuticalMinocycline HCl ER TabletsLupinindicated to treat only inflammatory lesions of non-nodular moderate to severe acne vulgaris in patients 12 years of age and older2/26/2019
SuboxoneIndiviorBuprenorphine HCl / Naloxone HClMylanfor treatment of Opioid dependence2/22/2019
SolodynMedicis PharmaceuticalMinocycline HCl ER TabletsTevaindicated to treat only inflammatory lesions of non-nodular moderate to severe acne vulgaris in patients 12 years of age and older2/21/2019
Acanya GelDow Pharmaceutical SciencesClindamycin Phosphate / Benzoyl Peroxide GelTevaindicated for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris in patients 12 years or older2/21/2019
SuboxoneIndiviorBuprenorphine HCl / Naloxone HClAlvogenfor treatment of Opioid dependence2/20/2019
SuboxoneIndiviorBuprenorphine HCl / Naloxone HClDr. Reddy'sfor treatment of Opioid dependence2/20/2019
ZarontinPfizerEthosuximide Softgel CapsulesStrides Shasunis an anti‐epileptic medication to control brief, sudden loss of
consciousness and uncontrolled jerking movements in children and adults
2/20/2019
SuboxoneIndiviorBuprenorphine HCl / Naloxone HClSandozfor treatment of Opioid dependence2/19/2019
OnfiLundbeckClobazam Oral SuspensionLupinindicated for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) in patients 2 years of age or older2/15/2019
ZytigaJanssenAbiraterone Acetate TabletsHikmaindicated in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)2/14/2019
Detrol LAPharmacia & UpjohnTolterodine Tartrate ER CapsulesCamber Pharmaceuticalsused to treat overactive bladder2/13/2019
AchromycinHeritage PharmsTetracycline CapsulesBreckenridgeused to treat many different bacterial infections, such as Urinary Tract Infections (UTI), Acne, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and others2/12/2019
AdcircaEli Lilly and CompanyTadalafil TabletsDr. Reddy'sindicated for the treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (WHO Group 1) to improve exercise ability2/12/2019
AdcircaEli Lilly and CompanyTadalafil TabletsLupinindicated for the treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (WHO Group 1) to improve exercise ability2/12/2019
Advair DiskusGlaxoFluticasone Propionate / Salmeterol Inhalation PowderMylanis used to control and prevent symptoms (wheezing and shortness of breath) caused by asthma or ongoing lung disease (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-COPD, which includes Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema)2/12/2019
Advair DiskusGlaxoFluticasone Propionate / Salmeterol Inhalation PowderPrascois used to control and prevent symptoms (wheezing and shortness of breath) caused by asthma or ongoing lung disease (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-COPD, which includes Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema)2/8/2019
AdcircaEli Lilly and CompanyTadalafil TabletsCiplaindicated for the treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (WHO Group 1) to improve exercise ability2/7/2019
AdcircaEli Lilly and CompanyTadalafil TabletsCamber Pharmaceuticalsindicated for the treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (WHO Group 1) to improve exercise ability2/6/2019
SabrilLundbeckVigabatrin TabletsTevaindicated as adjunctive therapy for adults and children (10 years of age or older) with refractory Complex Partial Seizures (CPS) who have inadequately responded to several alternative treatments and for whom the potential benefits outweigh the risk of vision loss2/6/2019
NorcoWarner ChilcottHydrocodone APAP TabletsCamber Pharmaceuticalsused to relieve moderate to severe pain2/5/2019
AnafranilSpecGxClomipramine HCl CapsulesLupintreatment of obsessions and compulsions in patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)2/5/2019
AdcircaEli Lilly and CompanyTadalafil TabletsTevaindicated for the treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (WHO Group 1) to improve exercise ability2/5/2019
DiprivanFresenius KabiPropofol Injectable EmulsionDr. Reddy'sused as initiation and maintenance of Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) sedation; combined sedation and regional anesthesia; induction of General Anesthesia Patients greater than or equal to 3 years of age; maintenance of General Anesthesia Patients greater than or equal to 2 months of age; Intensive Care Unit (ICU) sedation of intubated, mechanically ventilated patients1/24/2019
SupraneBaxter HealthcareDesflurane, Liquid for InhalationSandozis an inhalation agent indicated: for induction and/or maintenance of anesthesia in adults (1.1); for maintenance of anesthesia in pediatric patients following induction with agents other than Suprane and intubation1/24/2019
ComtanNovartisEntacapone TabletsLannettused in the treatment of Parkinson's Disease as an adjunct to Levodopa/Carbidopa Therapy1/22/2019
LovenoxSanofi AventisEnoxaparin Sodium Injection Apotexis an anticoagulant (blood thinner) used to prevent blood clots that are sometimes called Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), which can lead to blood clots in the lungs1/16/2019
SymjepiAdamis PharmaceuticalsEpinephrine for InjectionSandozfor the emergency treatment of allergic reactions (Type 1), including Anaphylaxis1/16/2019
TrandateCounty Line PharmaceuticalsLabetalol HCL Tablets TWi Pharmaceuticalsindicated for the treatment of Hypertension  1/16/2019
AlbenzaImpax LabsAlbendazole TabletsCamber Pharmaceuticalsused to treat infections of tapeworms or other parasites1/14/2019
ZytigaJanssenAbiraterone AcetateAmnealis used along with prednisone to treat men with prostate cancer that has spread to other areas of the body1/9/2019
LevitraBaxter HealthcareVardenafil HCl TabletsTevaindicated for the treatment of Erectile Dysfunction1/8/2019
Amgen SensiparCinacalcet HCl TabletsTevaindicated for secondary Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) in adult patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis; also used for the treatment of Hypercalcemia in adult patients with Parathyroid Carcinoma and severe Hypercalcemia in adult patients with primary HPT who are unable to undergo Parathyroidectomy12/27/2018

ANDA Litigation Settlements

$
0
0
Case NameDrugPatent No(s).Publicly Available Terms
Allergan, Inc. v. Saptalis Pharms., LLC, 18-1231 (D. Del.)Restasis® (cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion)8,633,162
8,642,556
N/A
Allergan, Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 18-1457 (D. Del.)Restasis® (cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion)8,633,162
8,642,556
N/A
AstraZeneca LP v. Prinston Pharm. Inc., 17-1639 (D. Del.)Brilinta® (ticagrelor tablets)6,251,910
RE 46,276
7,250,419
7,265,124
Prinston is enjoined from infringing the ’276, ’419, and ’124 patents.

All claims, counterclaims, affirmative defenses and demands in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs, disbursements or attorneys’ fees to any party.
Amgen Inc. v. Watson Labs., Inc., 18-2414 (Fed. Cir.)Sensipar® (cinacalcet hydrochloride tablets)9,375,405After launching at-risk, Watson will withdraw its product from the market.

Watson will pay Amgen an undisclosed amount.

Waston will wait until 2021 to re-launch its generic product.
Senju Pharm. Co., Ltd. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 18-16991 (D.N.J.)Prolensa® (bromfenac ophthalmic solution)8,129,431
8,669,290
8,754,131
8,871,813
8,927,606
9,144,609
9,517,220
9,561,277
10,085,958
In the event that the asserted patents against Amneal are not held invalid or unenforceable, Amneal’s admits that its ANDA product infringes those patents.

Amneal is enjoined from selling its ANDA product except as permitted by the settlement agreement.

Each party to bear its own costs.
Chiesi U.S.A., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 17-1772 (D. Del.)Bethkis® (tobramycin injection solution)6,987,094
7,696,178
7,939,502
Teva is enjoined from selling its ANDA product until the expiration of the patents-in-suit.

Each party waives its appeal rights.

Each party to bear its own costs.

All claims are dismissed without prejudice.
Delcor Asset Corp. v. Glenmark Pharms. Ltd., 18-0460 (D. Del.)Olux-E® (clobetasol propionate aerosol foam)6,730,288Glenmark submitted a patent amendment to revise its certification from Paragraph IV to Paragraph III.

All claims and counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice.

Parties to bear their own costs and fees.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Strides Pharma, Inc., 18-11134 (D.N.J.)Truvada® (emtricitabine / tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets)6,642,245
6,703,396
8,592,397
8,716,264
9,457,036
9,744,181
All claims and counterclaims dismissed with prejudice.

Parties to bear their own costs and fees.
Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. v. Macleods Pharms. Ltd., 18-13833 (D.N.J.)Latuda® (lurasidone HCl tablets)9,815,827
9,907,794
Macleods admits that the ’827 patent is enforceable and valid.

Macleods is enjoined from infringing the ’827 patent.

All claims and demands for relief prayed for by Plaintiffs against Macleods and Macleods against Plaintiffs in this action are deemed to be satisfied.
Mayne Pharma Int’l Pty Ltd. v. Lupin Ltd., 17-1637 (D. Del.)Doryx® MPC (doxycycline hyclate delayed-release tablets)9,295,652
9,446,057
9,511,031
Each asserted claim would be infringed by any unlicensed manufacture, sale, offer for sale, use, or importation in the US of the Lupin ANDA Product.

Each asserted claim of each of the Licensed Patents is valid and enforceable.

Lupin is is enjoined from making, having made, using, selling, offering to sell or distributing the Lupin ANDA Product in, or importing into, the US.

Lupin shall be entitled to contest the infringement, validity, and/or enforceability of the Licensed Patents in any future litigation of the Licensed Patents, pertaining to any product that is not the Lupin ANDA Product.

Each Party acknowledges and agrees that the 30-month stay with respect to the Lupin ANDA is terminated.

All claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses are dismissed with prejudice, without costs and fees.
AstraZeneca AB v. Apotex Corp., 16-0583 (D. Del.)Onglyza® (saxagliptin hydrochloride tablets)RE44,186The ’186 patent is enforceable and valid.

Apotex ANDA product infringes the ’186 patent.

Apotex is enjoined from making, having made, using, selling, offering to sell, importing or distributing its ANDA product until the expiration of the ’186 patent.

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A), the effective date of the approval of Apotex’s ANDA shall be no earlier than the expiration date of the the ’186 patent.

All remaining claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.

The parties waive any right to appeal.
Forest Labs., LLC v. Prinston Pharm. Inc., 17-7191 (D.N.J.)Byvalson® (nebivolol / valsartan tablets)7,803,838
7,838,552
The patents-in-suit are enforceable and valid.

Prinston’s filing of its ANDA infringes the patents-in-suit.

Prinston is enjoined from making, having made, using, selling, offering to sell, importing or distributing its ANDA product until the expiration of the patents-in-suit.

All remaining claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.

The parties waive any right to appeal.
Cephalon Inc. v. Innopharma Inc., Nos. 17-2377, 17-2378 (Fed. Cir.)Treanda® (bendamustine hydrochloride injection)8,436,190
8,609,863
8,791,270
8,895,756
N/A
Shire Development LLC v. SpecGx LLC, 18-0800 (D. Del.)Mydayis® (dextroamphetamine saccharate / amphetamine aspartate monohydrate / dextroamphetamine sulfate / amphetamine sulfate extended-release capsules)6,913,768
8,846,100
9,173,857
SpecGx acknowledges that the ’768 patent is valid and enforceable.

SpecGx acknowledges that its ANDA product infringes the ’768 patent.

Shire acknowledges that the SpecGx ANDA product does not infringe the ’100 and ’857 patents.

Shire and SpecGx agree to dismiss without prejudice all other claims, counterclaims and affirmative defenses.

Both parties waive their right to appeal and to seek costs and fees.
Pfizer Inc. v. Prinston Pharm. Inc., 18-0380 (D. Del.)Xeljanz® (tofacitinib tablets)RE41,783All claims and counterclaims between Plaintiffs and Prinston are dismissed without prejudice.

Any protective orders entered by the Court shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the dismissal of this action.

The parties waive any right of appeal.

Each party shall bear its own costs and fees.
Almirall, LLC v. Taro Pharms. Indus. Ltd., 17-0663 (D. Del.)Aczone® (dapsone gel)9,517,219N/A
Indivior Inc. v. Alvogen Pine Brook LLC, 18-5285 (D.N.J.)Suboxone® (buprenorphine HCl / naloxone HCl sublingual film)9,931,305N/A
Pharmacyclics LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, 18-0192 (D. Del.)Imbruvica® (ibrutinib tablets)8,008,309
7,514,444
8,697,711
8,735,403
8,957,079
9,181,257
8,754,091
8,497,277
8,952,015
8,476,284
8,754,090
9,296,753
9,725,455
9,540,382
9,713,617
No party admits liability.

Each party shall bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses incurred in connection with the claims dismissed by this Order.

Plaintiffs’ claims against Teva and Hetero are dismissed without prejudice.

Tevaand Hetero’s claims against Plaintiffs are dismissed without prejudice.
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Perrigo Pharma Int’l DAC, 18-17518 (D.N.J.)Jublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)10,105,444Perrigo’s ANDA product infringes the ‘444 patent.

Perrigo is enjoined from (i) making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing until expiration of the ‘444 patent the Perrigo ANDA product in the United States, and (ii) participating in the profits from making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing the Perrigo Product in the United States, and (iii) indemnifying others with respect to any making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing the Perrigo Product in the United States.

Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Perrigo is entitled to maintain its Paragraph IV certification to the ‘444 Patent pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 314.94(a)(12)(v).

The 30-month stay with respect to the approval of the Perrigo ANDA is terminated.
Osi Pharms., LLC v. Shilpa Medicare Ltd., 18-1096 (D. Del.)Tarceva® (erlotinib HCl tablets)6,900,221The complaint is dismissed, without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
Genzyme Corp. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, 18-1934 (D. Del.)Mozobil® (plerixafor for injection)7,897,590
6,987,102
Fresenius Kabi is enjoined from making, having made, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing in or into the US any product under ANDA No. 212395.

All claims are dismissed with prejudice.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

The parties each expressly waive any right to appeal.
Arena Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 17-0231 (D. Del.)Belviq XR® (lorcaserin HCl tablets)6,953,787
7,514,422
7,977,329
8,207,158
8,273,734
8,546,379
8,575,149
8,999,970
9,169,213
Teva has infringed the patents-in-suit by filing ANDA No. 209918.

Except as permitted by the Settlement Agreement, Teva is enjoined from making, having made, using, selling, offering to sell, importing or distributing any lorcaserin HCl product pursuant to ANDA No. 209918, until any grant of license to the patents-in-suit provided in the Settlement Agreement to Teva becomes effective.

All claims and counterclaims, affirmative defenses and demands are dismissed without prejudice and without costs, disbursements or attorneys’ fees.

The parties each expressly waive any right to appeal.
Apotex Inc. v. Symplmed Pharms., LLC, 17-0276 (D. Del.)Prestalia® (perindopril arginine / amlodipine besylate oral tablets)6,696,481
7,846,961
Defendants grant to Apotex a non-exclusive license to manufacture, import, offer for sale, and sell the Apotex ANDA Product in the U.S. as of the date, and upon the terms, set forth in the Confidential License Agreement.

Apotex’s action is dismissed with prejudice.
Delcor Asset Corp. v. Glenmark Pharms. Ltd., 17-1653 (D. Del.)Evoclin® (clindamycin phosphate aerosol, foam)7,141,237
7,374,747
All claims, defenses, and counterclaims between the parties are dismissed without prejudice.

Each party shall bear its own costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses.
Biogen MA Inc. v. Sun Pharma Global FZE, 17-0848 (D. Del.)Tecfidera® (dimethyl fumarate delayed-release capsules)8,399,514N/A
Pharmacyclics LLC v. Shilpa Medicare Ltd., 18-0237 (D. Del.)Imbruvica® (ibrutinib tablets)9,296,753
9,725,455
8,999,999
9,801,881
9,801,883
No party admits liability.

Each party shall bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses.

Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant are dismissed without prejudice.

Defendant’s claims against Plaintiffs are dismissed without prejudice.
Shionogi Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 17-0072 (D. Del.)Fortamet® (metformin extended-release tablets)6,790,459
6,866,866
All claims dismissed with prejudice.

Each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 17-0227 (D. Del.)Victoza® (liraglutide recombinant solution injection)6,268,343
8,114,833
8,846,618
9,265,893
RE41,956
The patents-in-suit are infringed by any unlicensed manufacture, sale, offer for sale, use, or importation in the United States of the generic product that is subject of Teva’s ANDA.

Teva will be enjoined until expiration of patents-in-suit from making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing into the US the Teva ANDA Product.

Teva shall be entitled to contest the infringement, validity and/or enforceability of the patents-in-suit in any future litigation over the patents-in-suit pertaining to any product that is not the Teva Product.

Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. West-ward Pharms. Int’l Ltd., 14-1196, -1508, 15-0128 (D. Del.)Afinitor® (everolimus tablets)5,665,772
7,297,703
7,741,338
6,004,973
6,239,124
6,455,518
Parties stipulate and agree that all claims and counterclaims and affirmative defenses are dismissed without prejudice, and without costs, disbursements or attorneys’ fees to any party.
Adare Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. Int’l GMBH, 18-1079 (D. Del.)Amrix® (cyclobenzaprine HCl extended-release capsules)9,399,025
9,375,410
All claims asserted by Plaintiffs against Inventia are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and all counterclaims asserted by Inventia are hereby dismissed without prejudice.

Each party to bear its own costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses.
Astellas Pharma Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 16-0942 (D. Del.)Myrbetriq® (mirabegron extended-release tablets)7,342,117
7,982,049
8,835,474
RE44,872
All claims and counterclaims dismissed without prejudice.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Court shall retain jurisdiction over the settlement agreement in this case.
Sun Pharm. Indus. Ltd. v. Novartis Pharms. Corp., 19-0276 (D.N.J.)Jadenu® (deferasirox tablets)9,283,209Sun voluntarily dismisses, without prejudice, its complaint.

All parties shall pay their own costs, including attorneys’ fees.
Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 18-1039 (D. Del.)Gilenya® (fingolimod capsules)9,187,405N/A
Valeant Pharms. North America LLC v. Macleods Pharms. Ltd., 18-14204 (D.N.J.)Jublia® (efinaconazole topical solution)7,214,506
8,039,494
8,486,978
9,302,009
9,566,272
9,662,394
9,861,698
9,877,955
The patents-in-suit are infringed by Macleods’s ANDA product.

Macleods will be enjoined until expiration of patents-in-suit from making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing into the US its ANDA Product.

Macleods shall be entitled to contest the infringement, validity and/or enforceability of the patents-in-suit in any future litigation over the patents-in-suit pertaining to any product that is not the Macleods Product.

Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Ascent Pharms., Inc., 18-0855 (D. Del.)OxyContin® (oxycodone HCl extended-release tablets)9,060,976
9,073,933
9,522,919
9,147,533
9,861,582
8,309,060
9,675,610
All claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.

No right, written or oral license or sublicense, covenant not to sue, waiver or release or other written or oral authorization is or has been granted or implied by this Stipulated Dismissal.

The Action is hereby dismissed without costs or attorney’s fees, save that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Action, including without limitation, over implementation of, or disputes arising out of, this Stipulated Dismissal or the settlement of the Action.
Celgene Corp. v. Lotus Pharm. Co., Ltd., 18-11518 (D.N.J.)Revlimid® (lenalidomide capsules)7,977,357
8,193,219
8,431,598
Lotus is enjoined from infringing the patents-in-suit until their expiration, unless authorized by Celgene.

All claims, counterclaims, affirmative defenses and demands in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs, disbursements or attorneys’ fees to any party.

Nothing prohibits Lotus from maintaining any “Paragraph IV Ccrtiflcation” pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355G)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) or pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 31 4.94(a)( 12) with respect to the Patents-in-Suit.

Nothing herein restricts or is intended to restrict the FDA from approving Lotus’s ANDA application.
In re: copaxone patent litigation, C.A. 16-1267 (D. Del.)Copaxone® (glatiramer acetate injection)9,155,775
9,763,993
Plaintiff Teva and Defendants Sandoz and Momenta dismiss with prejudice all calims and counterclaims against each other in this action.

Each party to bear its own costs and fees.

The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of this dismissal and the agreement and any disputes that may arise thereunder.

ANDA Approvals

$
0
0
Approval DateReference Listed DrugGeneric Drug NameNDA HolderANDA Applicant
1/2/2019Mirapex ERPramipexole DihydrochlorideBoehringer IngelheimAlembic Pharms
1/3/2019LatudaLurasidone HClSunovionAmneal
1/3/2019LatudaLurasidone HClSunovionInvagen Pharms
1/3/2019LatudaLurasidone HClSunovionLupin
1/3/2019LatudaLurasidone HClSunovionAccord Hlthcare
1/3/2019AubagioTeriflunomideSanofi AventisSandoz
1/3/2019DolophineMethadone HClWest-Ward PharmsAscent Pharms
1/4/2019Naproxen SodiumNaproxen Sodium (OTC)BionpharmaCatalent
1/4/2019LatudaLurasidone HClSunovionSun Pharma
1/4/2019Rythmol SRPropafenone HClGlaxoSmithKlineSinotherapeutics
1/7/2018AbilifyAripiprazoleOtsukaZydus
1/7/2018ZytigaAbiraterone AcetateJanssenAmneal
1/7/2018PicatoIngenol MebutateLeo LabsPerrigo UK Finco
1/7/2018AubagioTeriflunomideSanofi AventisAccord Healthcare
1/8/2019ExelonRivastigmineNovartisAmneal
1/8/2019CellCeptMycophenolate MofetilRocheConcord Biotech
1/9/2019PicatoIngenol MebutateLeo LabsPerrigo
1/9/2019MedrolMethylprednisolonePharmacia and UpjohnRiconPharma
1/10/2019BenicarOlmesartan MedoxomilDaiichi SankyoQilu Pharm
1/10/2019Fluoxetine HClFluoxetine HClAlvogenSciegen
1/11/2019CaduetAmlodipine Besylate / Atorvastatin CalciumPfizerZydus
1/11/2019Betamethasone DipropionateBetamethasone DipropionateFougeraZydus
1/11/2019ZoviraxAcyclovirBausch & LombTorrent
1/11/2019FemaraLetrozoleNovartisEugia Pharma
1/14/2019ViramuneNevirapineBoehringer IngelheimMacLeods
1/14/2019MicrozideHydrochlorothiazideAllergan SalesSciegen
1/14/2019BusulfexBusulfanOtsukaNexus Pharms
1/14/2019LotronexAlosetron HClSebelaRising Pharms
1/14/2019SabrilVigabatrinLundbeckTeva
1/15/2019RelpaxEletriptan HydrobromidePfizerAurobindo
1/15/2019PlaquenilHydroxychloroquine SulfateConcordia PharmsLaurus Labs
1/16/2019DiamoxAcetazolamideTevaXylopia
1/16/2019EffientPrasugrelEli Lilly and CoHEC Pharm
1/16/2019SyprineTrientine HClAtonNavinta
1/17/2019GleevecImatinib MesylateNovartisShilpa Medicare
1/17/2019GleevecImatinib MesylateNovartisWockhardt
1/18/2019PrecedexDexmedetomidine HClHospiraCipla
1/18/2019PrevacidLansoprazoleTakedaAlkem Labs
1/18/2019Levo-T / Synthroid / Thyro-Tabs/ UnithroidLevothyroxine SodiumCediprof / AbbVie / Lloyd / StevensLupin
1/18/2019CyclophosphamideCyclophosphamideWest-Ward PharmsCipla
1/18/2019ZoviraxAcyclovirBausch & LombCipla
1/22/2019Adderall XRDextroamp Saccharate / AMP Aspartate / Dextroamp Sulfate / AMP SulfateShireAmerigen Pharms
1/22/2019Klor-ConPotassium ChlorideUpsher-Smith LabsPII
1/22/2019TikosynDofetildePfizerAurobindo
1/22/2019Retin-ATretinoinValeant Taro Pharms
1/23/2019BrilintaTicagrelorAstraZenecaAmneal
1/23/2019BrilintaTicagrelorAstraZenecaHisun Pharm Hangzhou
1/24/2019TrusoptDorzolamide HClMerckFDC
1/24/2019SuboxoneBuprenorphine HCl / Naloxone HClIndiviorAlvogen Pine Brook
1/25/2019Aleve PMNaproxen Sodium / Diphenhydramine ChlorideBayer HealthcareActavis
1/25/2019IntegrilinEptifibatideScheringHainan Poly Pharm
1/25/2019BentylDicyclomine HClAllerganFresenius Kabi
1/25/2019Depo-ProveraMedroxyprogesterone  AcetatePharmacia and UpjohnCipla
1/25/2019Retin-ATretinoinValeantTaro Pharms
1/25/2019Fluoxetine HydrochlorideFluoxetine HydrochlorideAlvogenDr Reddy's Labs
1/25/2019ZanaflexTizanidine HClCovis PharmaAlkem Labs
1/25/2019LialdaMesalamineShireSun Pharm
1/28/2019Lactated Ringer's in Plastic ContainerSodium Chloride / Sodium Lactate / Potssium Chloride / Calcium Chloride in WaterBaxter HealthcareFresenius Kabi
1/28/2019Cleocin TClindamycin PhosphatePharmacia and UpjohnEncube Ethicals
1/28/2019DDAVPDesmopressin AcetateFerring PharmsAbhai
1/28/2019Wellbutrin XLBupropion HClValeantGraviti Pharms
1/28/2019RapamuneSirolimusPF PrismNovitium Pharma
1/29/2019VazculepPhenylephrine HClWest-Ward Pharm / Avadel LegacyFresenius Kabi
1/30/2019AdvairWixela InhubGlaxo Mylan
1/30/2019VazculepPhenylephrine HClAvadel LegacyFresenius Kabi
1/30/2019DesonideDesonidePerrigoEncube Ethicals
1/30/2019OnfiClobazamLundbeckMicro Labs
1/31/2019VazculepPhenylephrine HClWest-Ward Pharm / Avadel LegacySandoz
1/31/2019ProtopicTacrolimusLeo PharmaAccord Healthcare
2/1/2019BentylDicyclomine HClAllerganNexus Pharms
2/1/2019RitalinMethylphenidate HClNovartisCediprof
2/4/2019TrandateLabetalol HClCounty Line PharmsInvatech Pharma
2/4/2019ZoviraxAcyclovirBausch & LombPerrigo
2/4/2019FetzimaLevomilnacipran HClAllerganAmneal
2/4/2019Oxycodone HClOxycodone HClGenus LifesciencesAlkem Labs
2/5/2019AdcircaTadalafilEli Lilly and CoAurobindo
2/5/2019AdcircaTadalafilEli Lilly and CoHetero
2/5/2019AdcircaAlyqEli Lilly and CoTeva
2/5/2019AdcircaTadalafilEli Lilly and CoDr Reddy's Labs
2/5/2019AdcircaTadalafilEli Lilly and CoCipla
2/5/2019AdcircaTadalafilEli Lilly and CoAjanta Pharma
2/5/2019AdcircaTadalafilEli Lilly and CoLupin
2/5/2019Vivelle-DotEstradiolNovartisAmneal
2/6/2019SeasonaleSyleviaTeva Sun Pharm
2/7/2019Tegretol-XRCarbamazepineNovartisZydus
2/7/2019NicoretteNicotine PolacrilexGlaxoSmithKlinePLD Acquisitions
2/7/2019Benicar HCTOlmesartan Medoxomil / HydrochlorothiazideDaiichi SankyoAccord Healthcare
2/7/2019Oxycodone HClOxycodone HClGenus Lifesciences / VistaPharmAlkem Labs
2/8/2019RenagelSevelamer HClGenzymeGlenmark
2/8/2019GleevecImatinib MesylateNovartisBreckenridge
2/8/2019GleevecImatinib MesylateNovartisAmneal
2/8/2019FerriproxDeferiproneApopharmaTaro Pharm
2/8/2019SyprineTrientine HClAtonAmneal
2/8/2019ColcrysColchicineTakedaAlkem Labs
2/8/2019Fluoxetine HClFluoxetine HClAlvogenLupin
2/8/2019LipitorAtorvastatin CalciumPfizerMSN Labs
2/11/2019DyazideTriamterene and HydrochlorothiazideGlaxoSmithKlineZydus
2/11/2019OmeprazoleOmeprazole (OTC)Dexcel PharmaApotex
2/11/2019Triamcinolone AcetonideTriamcinolone AcetonideMylanStrides Pharma
2/11/2019BentylDicyclomine HClAllerganCustopharm
2/12/2019CellCeptMycophenolate MofetilRocheVistaPharm
2/13/2019VigamoxMoxifloxacin HClNovartis Alembic Pharms
2/13/2019SynalarFluocinolone AcetonideMedimetriks PharmsEncube Ethicals
2/14/2019DDAVPDesmopressin AcetateFerringLuitpold
2/14/2019Gemcitabine HClGemcitabine HClHospiraIngenus Pharms
2/14/2019Advil PMIbuprofen / Diphenhydramine HClPfizerAurobindo Pharma
2/15/2019EloxatinOxaliplatinSanofi Aventis  / TevaSun Pharma
2/15/2019ActonelRisedronate SodiumApilHangzhou Binjiang
2/15/2019OluxClobetasol PropionateMylanGlenmark
2/19/2019MicardisTelmisartanBoehringer IngelheimHisun Pharm Hangzhou
2/19/2019DiamoxAcetazolamideTeva Alembic Pharms
2/19/2019Levo-T / Levoxyl / Synthroid / UnithroidLevothyroxine SodiumCediprof / King Pharms / AbbVie / StevensAmneal
2/19/2019MarcaineBupivacaine HClHospiraNovocol Healthcare
2/19/2019ColcrysColchicineTakedaZydus
2/19/2019ZarontinEthosuximideParke DavisStrides
2/20/2019ZoviraxAcyclovirBausch & LombPerrigo
2/20/2019NimbexCisatracurium Besylate Preservative FreeAbbVieSomerset Theraps
2/20/2019MephytonPhytonadioneBausch & LombZydus
2/21/2019RocaltrolCalcitriolValidus PharmsSun Pharm
2/21/2019AbilifyAripiprazoleOtsukaAlkem Labs
2/21/2019AromasinExemestanePharmacia and UpjohnBreckenridge
2/22/2019NiaspanNiacinAbbVieMylan
2/22/2019AntivertMeclizine HClCasper PharmaIndicus Pharma
2/22/2019GemzarGemcitabine HClEli Lilly and CoShilpa Medicare
2/22/2019MedrolMethylprednisolonePharmacia and UpjohnLupin
2/22/2019CyklokapronTranexamic AcidPharmacia and UpjohnAcic Pharms
2/22/2019BusulfexBusulfanOtsukaAccord Healthcare
2/22/2019BenicarOlmesartan MedoxomilDaiichi SankyoSunshine Lake
2/22/2019TessalonBenzonatatePfizerAscent Pharms
2/22/2019ClolarClofarabineGenzymeAccord Healthcare
2/25/2019Flagyl I.V. RTU in Plastic Container / Metro I.V. in Plastic Container / Metronidazole in Plastic ContainerMetronidazole in Plastic ContainerBaxter Healthcare / B Braun / HospiraInforlife
2/25/2019LovazaOmega-3-Acid Ethyl EstersSmithKline BeechamAscent Pharms
2/25/2019ZytigaAbiraterone AcetateJanssenRising Pharms
2/26/2019ZithromaxAzithromycinPfizerBionpharma
2/26/2019ZithromaxAzithromycinPfizerBionpharma
2/27/2019ZytigaAbiraterone AcetateJanssenWockhardt
2/27/2019VidazaAzacitidineCelgeneLupin
2/27/2019TamifluOseltamivir PhosphateRocheTeva
2/28/2019Ditropan XLOxybutynin ChlorideJanssenAjanta
3/1/2019PerphenazinePerphenazineSandozRising Pharms
3/1/2019CrestorRosuvastatin CalciumIPRZydus
3/1/2019GleevecImatinib MesylateNovartisNatco Pharma
3/1/2019ProtonixPantoprazole SodiumWyethIngenus Pharms
3/4/2019Micardis HCTTelmisartan / HydrochlorothiazideBoehringer IngelheimGlenmark
3/4/2019ExelonRivastigmineNovartisZydus
3/4/2019FaslodexFulvestrantAstraZenecaAmneal
3/5/2019EpivirLamivudineViiV HealthcareMylan
3/5/2019BepreveBepotastine BesilateBausch and LombApotex
3/5/2019Nexium 24HrEsomeprazole MagnesiumAstraZenecaActavis
3/5/2019KapvayClonidine HClConcordia PharmsNovast Labs
3/6/2019LipitorAtorvastatin CalciumPfizerLupin
3/8/2019TenoreticAtenolol and ChlorthalidoneAlvogen MaltaZydus
3/8/2019MestinonPyridostigmine BromideBauschNovitium Pharma
3/11/2019IntegrilinEptifibatideScheringUSV
3/11/2019Micro-K / Micro-K 10Potassium ChlorideNesher PharmsZydus
3/11/2019AmpyraDalfampridineAcordaMicro Labs
3/12/2019DiovanValsartanNovartisAlkem
3/12/2019ClaritinLoratadineBayer HealthcareNewgen Pharms
3/12/2019ZanaflexTizanidine HClCovis PharmaRiconPharma
3/12/2019Procardia XLNifedipinePfizerNovast Labs
3/12/2019ZyloprimAllopurinolCasper PharmaUnichem Labs
3/12/2019DesonideDesonidePerrigoTeligent Pharma
3/13/2019YasminKemeyaBayer HealthcareSun Pharm
3/13/2019Sodium Chloride 3% in Plastic ContainerSodium Chloride 3% in Plastic ContainerBaxter HealthcareFresenius Kabi
3/13/2019Children's Zyrtec Cetirizine HClJ and J ConsumerHetero Labs Ltd III
3/14/2019IntegrilinEpifibatideScheringUSV
3/14/2019LovenoxEnoxaparin SodiumSanofi AventisAmphastar
3/15/2019Diovan HCTValsartan / HydrochlorothiazideNovartisZydus
3/15/2019ZoviraxAcyclovirBauschZydua
3/18/2019BepreveBepotastine BesilateBausch and LombMicro Labs
3/18/2019LidexFluocinonideCounty Line PharmsTeligent Pharma
3/19/2019InvanzErtapenem SodiumMerck Sharp DohmeSavior Lifetec
3/19/2019LatudaLurasidone HClSunovionZydus
3/20/2019AggrenoxAspirin / DipyridamoleBoehringer IngelheimLannett
3/20/2019NaftinNaftifine HClSebelaTolmar
3/21/2019Epivir-HBVLamivudineGlaxoSmithKlineAnnora
3/22/2019TekturnaAliskiren HemifumarateNoden PharmaAnchen Pharms
3/22/2019DalirespRoflumilastAstraZenecaMicro Labs
3/22/2019Makena Preservative FreeHydroxyprogesterone CaproateAmag PharmaSlayback Pharma
3/22/2019YazDrospirenone / Ethinyl EstradiolBayer HealthcareHetero
3/22/2019ViagraSildenafil CitratePfizerLupin
3/25/2019ViagraSildenafil CitratePfizerMylan
3/25/2019NuvigilArmodafinilCephalonApotex
3/26/2019BaracludeEntecavirBristol-Myers SquibbMylan
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoAlembic
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoAurobindo
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoZydus
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoSun Pharm
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoAccord Healthcare
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoUnichem Labs
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoCipla 
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoAjanta
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoAmneal
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoHetero
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoDr Reddy's Labs
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoQilu Pharm
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoLupin
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoSunshine Lake
3/26/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoTorrent
3/26/2019AdcircaTadalafilEli Lilly and CoTorrent
3/26/2019ZanaflexTizanidine HClCovis PharmaCadila
3/27/2019ZanaflexTizanidine HClCovis PharmaAlkem Labs
3/28/2019LetairisAmbrisentanGileadWatson
3/28/2019LetairisAmbrisentanGileadMylan
3/28/2019LetairisAmbrisentanGileadZydus
3/28/2019LetairisAmbrisentanGileadSun Pharm
3/28/2019Xyzal Allergy 24HrLevocetirizine DihydrochlorideSanofi AvenitsPerrigo
3/29/2019CialisTadalafilEli Lilly and CoWatson
3/29/2019AzilectRasagiline MesylateTevaMicro Labs
3/29/2019Potassium ChloridePotassium ChlorideGenus LifesciencesPharm Assoc
Viewing all 408 articles
Browse latest View live